<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Gary Kleppe&#039;s Web Site</title>
    <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/</link>
    <description>Gary Kleppe&#039;s personal Web Site</description>
    <language>en-us</language>           
    <generator>Nucleus CMS v3.64</generator>
    <copyright>Ã¯Â¿Â½</copyright>             
    <category>Weblog</category>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    
    <item>
 <title>Why free proprietary Internet services are a bad deal, part 32,767</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=110</link>
<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.addictinginfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/0000-removed-content-1.png"/><br />
<br />
A user shared the image show on Facebook, which in return suspended his account.<br />
<br />
Had he been using a portable service to share his content (like the one that's hosting the site you're reading) he could've picked up and moved to another service. But Facebook is a monopoly, and hence free to dick over its customers at will.<br />
<br />
We gave corporations control of most of our food, health care, mass media, and many other needs in exchange for a little convenience. That didn't work out too well. Maybe we should think twice before giving them control over our Internet services.]]></description>
 <category>Issues</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=110</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:31:48 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Endorsed: Sayyed et al for York Township; Bullwinkel, Wagner, Davis for Villa Park; Flores and Agustin for CoD</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=105</link>
<description><![CDATA[Because absolutely nobody asked for it, and if past precedent is any guide the only people who will care are candidates who <i>don't</i> get chosen, my thoughts on the April 9 election:<br />
<br />
First and foremost, support the <a href="http://www.yorkdemocrats.org/elections.php" target="_blank">Democratic slate for York Township offices</a>.<br />
<br />
<b>Ahmed Sayyed</b> for Supervisor<br />
<b>Joe Vosicky</b> for Clerk<br />
<b>Mark Pitchford</b> for Highway Commissioner<br />
<b>Cathy Sewell, Diane Blair Sherlock, and Carol Davis</b> for Trustee<br />
<br />
It should be obvious that the current York Township government is mostly useless. Most residents are barely aware that they exist. About three-quarters of their budget is spent on staff salaries, which keep going up despite the economy, and other administrative costs. They have little or no money for youth services, but do have money to send out full-color brochures touting themselves, which for some odd reason always seem to arrive around election time. They do provide services for seniors, some of them necessary and valuable ones, but when they do they'll be sure to use the opportunity to persuade those seniors to vote for them. The purpose of the township, according to the current incumbents, it seems, is to keep the current incumbents in office. We the taxpayers have different priorities. The only way we'll get a township government that is actually worth the money we put into it is to vote out Mr. Valle and as many of his cronies as possible.<br />
<br />
If you live in Villa Park, please vote for <b>Deborah Bullwinkel</b> for village president. Bullwinkel has been an independent voice on the village board of trustees. She will bring energy and fresh ideas to the office of president. Her opponent is the former village police chief who has been the subject of <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/suburbs/lombard_villa_park/ct-met-villa-park-race-20130404,0,5231060,full.story" target="_blank">investigative articles by the Chicago Tribune</a>:<br />
<blockquote>Long before an Internet sex picture overshadowed his candidacy, John Heidelmeier was the popular police chief of Villa Park &mdash; and was facing secret accusations of mismanagement.</blockquote><br />
<blockquote>The newspaper's review of hundreds of pages of records previously denied to the public found that, before the ink was dry on last year's gag order, village officials had quietly begun accusing the chief of assorted mismanagement, including:<br />
&bull;Keeping an evidence room that was in disarray, with $10,000 in cash and a bucket of guns left unlogged.<br />
&bull;Hiring an officer against the advice of a psychological assessment who then was later accused of roughing up a teenage girl who had done nothing wrong.<br />
&bull;Giving a convicted felon wide access to the department, including riding along with officers on patrol.</blockquote><br />
There's more. Read the whole article. See also comments posted by a local resident on the <a href="http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20130308/discuss/703089922/" target="_blank">Daily Herald's endorsement of Bullwinkel</a>:<br />
<blockquote>I have personally dealt with this bumbling police department. About 2 and a half years ago I was less than a block from my house minding my own business when all of a sudden I was surrounded by 5 police cars. Guns drawn they yelled at me to put my hands in the air. They then proceeded to force me to the ground even though I had clearly given up. My neighbors had all tried to tell them who I was and that I had just come out of my house. I had asked my neighbor to please go tell my mom what was going on so that someone could find me at the police station. I was put into the squad car and driven away, everytime I asked the officer what was going on he told me to "shut the hell up" I was taken to an area aproximately a quarter mile from my house taken out of the squad to be identified. I will never forget the woman identifying me when they had asked her "is that him?" she replied "not even close" I was then put back into the squad car still handcuffed even though I had done nothing wrong. I was then driven home and dropped off in front of my house while the officer turned his lights on uncuffed me outside of the car for all my neighbors to see and then didn't even apologize. Too this day it makes my blood boil to think about this incident. To make matters worse when my mom who had just had heart surgery a few months prior to this incident, went to the police department to find out what had happened to me the woman at the front desk threatened to have her arrested. Real Classy VPPD. Don't believe me? you can ask multiple neighbors who saw what happened. If Heidelmeier can't run his police department competently how can we trust him to run Villa Park?</blockquote><br />
(I don't know this person and can't vouch for the truth of these accusations. One should always be careful about what one reads, especially on the Internet.)<br />
<br />
I've had personal experience with Heidelmeier's core supporters. Recently the <a href="http://www.yorkdemocrats.org/" target="_blank">York Township Democratic Organization</a> voted to endorse Bullwinkel. I am chair of YTDO but did not vote for or against this endorsement. State Senator Cullerton, a strong Heidelmeier supporter recently elected as a Democrat with support from the party, responded by pulling his support from a YTDO fundraiser. Another Heidelmeier supporter posted under an assumed name on YTDO's Facebook page harping on Bullwinkel's past support for selected Republican candidates, ignoring Heidelmeier's own record of voting Republican. Many more Heidelmeier supporters frequent  <a href="http://www.villaparksoapbox.com/forum" target="_blank">this forum</a>. For a candidate whose selling points are leadership ability and that he'll listen to your ideas and opinions, it's interesting how many of his supporters apparently have zero tolerance for ideas that they don't agree with. They are more like Groucho Marx: "If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you."<br />
<br />
<b>Robert J. "Bob" Wagner</b> for Villa Park Trustee is an obvious choice, especially for Democrats. Bob ran as one back when nobody thought Democrats could win in this area. As party township chair, party state central committeeman, library trustee, and everything else he's done, he's always displayed strict honesty and thoughtfulness. <b>John Davis</b> is an incumbent village trustee who has served with integrity and deserves to be re-elected. A third candidate, Robert Taglia, is also an incumbent and is aligned with Bullwinkel, Wagner, and Davis; he's been a responsible trustee but his conservative Republican views make me reluctant to recommend him. For local office his ideological views aren't that big of an issue but village elected officials can grow up to seek higher office. Other candidates include Greg Hassler who is not aligned with either camp; he seems to have a pretty good grasp of the issues but I don't know a lot about him. Rodney Pate seems to have some smarts and good sense except for his decision to align with the Heidelmeier camp.<br />
<br />
For College of DuPage Trustees, please vote for <b>Ed Agustin</b> and <b>Frank Flores Jr.</b>. College of DuPage has been plagued by mismanagement. Tuition keeps rising and the current administration seems more interested in putting up new buildings than it does in actually working to help the students. Agustin and Flores will hold them accountable. Accusations of harrassment against the latter seem to be unverified.<br />
]]></description>
 <category>Local politics</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=105</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 6 Apr 2013 08:09:20 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>True GRIT</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=103</link>
<description><![CDATA[A large chunk (though certainly not all) of Illinois' financial problems are due to its tax structure. The state constitution mandates that the state income tax be flat, i.e. that those individuals in higher brackets may not be charged higher rates than those at the bottom. This makes it impossible to raise rates on those who could afford to pay more without also raising them on those who can't.<br />
<br />
An amendment to change this has been filed as HJRCA0002 by Reps. Naomi Jakobsson and Linda Chapa LaVia. This would amend the state constitution to allow different tax rates for different income ranges, as the federal income tax and those of most other states' do. The Illinois League of Women Voters refers to this as a GRIT Fair Tax, GRIT meaning Graduated Rate Income Tax.<br />
<br />
Passing this would be a multi-step process:<ol><li>Three-fifths majorities in each house of the legislature (36 Senators and 71 House members, assuming no abstentions) must vote to put it on the ballot.</li><li>Once on the ballot, it must be approved by a three-fifths majority of everyone voting on the amendment, or by a simple majority of everyone who voted in the election even counting those who skipped this particular question.</li><li>With the amendment passed into law, the legislature would need to create a graduated tax rate plan and pass it through the normal legislative process.</li></ol><br />
<br />
The push for GRIT/Fair Tax in Illinois is supported by organizations including the <a href="http://www.lwvil.org/" target="_blank">IL League of Women Voters</a>, <a href="http://www.jwj.org/" target="_blank">Jobs With Justice</a>, and the <a href="http://ctbaonline.org/" target="_blank">Center For Tax and Budget Accountability</a>. We need to persuade our representatives to let us vote on it. But even while that's going on, we need to talk to people in our communities about it and counter what the propaganda mills are saying. A lot of misinformation is already being spread and it will increase greatly by the time it actually comes up for a vote.<br />
<br />
Below the fold, a number of arguments you're likely to hear against the graduated tax, and why they're disingenuous or just wrong. <i><b>Myths Concerning the Graduated Rate Tax</b></i><br />
<br />
<b>Myth</b>: <i>We don't need new taxes; we can solve the budget problems by cutting spending.</i><br />
It's an article of faith among right-wingers that government financial problems are always due to overspending, never due to inadequate revenue. All facts indicate otherwise.<br />
<br />
After adjusting for inflation, our state government spends substantially less than it did twenty years ago. We are at or near the bottom of state rankings for categories such as state employees per capita or percentage of education funding provided by the state. And the effects of underspending are clear: our schools are understaffed, roads and other infrastructure are barely being kept up, and more and more people can't get critically needed health assistance, especially for mental health disorders. Do we really want mentally ill individuals running around unsupervised, especially if they have unlimited access to weaponry?<br />
<br />
Is there waste in the state budget? No doubt there is, and it should be eliminated. But there isn't enough of it to make any significant impact on the budget gap. Spending cuts deny services to those who need them most and will cost more in the long run.<br />
<br />
What's more, as CTBA's anaylsis has shown, our state's expenses are increasing faster than its tax revenues. So even if through some miracle we balanced the budget this year through cuts, it wouldn't stay balanced for the next and succeeding years. Our problems are structural, and only a structural fix will address them.<br />
<br />
<b>Myth</b>: <i>The state's financial problems are the fault of greedy teachers and other state employees.</i><br />
If teachers were overpaid, a lot more people would want to be one. In fact, teaching jobs like others in public service offer low pay compared to others requiring comparable training. What's more, teachers have to face situations that are difficult and sometimes dangerous. And the service they provide is unquestionably valuable. In a country where bankers can wreck the economy and reap multi-million-dollar bonuses, and where others can get multi-million-dollar salaries for throwing balls around a field, it's unconscionable that we should begrudge teachers a reasonably comfortable retirement, especially for those to whom this was promised when they first signed up for the job.<br />
<br />
The so-called pension crisis wasn't caused by employees. The state government under both parties caused the crisis by borrowing against the pension fund in order to spend money on services without taxing the public for what the services cost. It would be grossly unfair and unworkable to try to balance the budget on the backs of retirees.<br />
<br />
<b>Myth</b>: <i>This is just a way of allowing the legislature a blank check to increase our taxes.</i><br />
The legislature already has the power to raise taxes. The only thing it can't do is limit tax increases to upper-income payers.<br />
<br />
<b>Myth</b>: <i>This will raise your taxes.</i><br />
Under the current flat tax, eventually the state will have to pay its obligations, and the only way to do this would be to raise taxes of some sort on you and everyone else. With a graduated tax, increases could be limited to top income brackets. How this would work would depend on the details of the tax plan passed, but under one such scenario analyzed by the CTBA, 96% of all Illinois taxpayers would pay less tax. So most likely, unless your salary is in at least six figures, the graduated tax is the only way your taxes won't go up.<br />
<br />
<b>Myth</b>: <i>The only really fair tax is where everyone pays the same rate.</i><br />
A flat tax is anything but fair. For the people at the bottom, a five-percent tax (for example) might mean having to give up a vacation, or a child's education, or even health care. For those at the top, it would mean no sacrifice even remotely comparable.<br />
<br />
But in reality, our tax structure is anything but flat. When one factors in sales taxes, property taxes, and all other taxes and fees imposed by state and local governments, bottom-level income earners actually pay a much higher percentage than top-level ones under Illinois' current structure.<br />
<br />
<b>Myth</b>: <i>Higher taxes on upper incomes will stifle entrepreneurship and investment.</i><br />
Did you hear the story about the Fortune 500 CEO who gave up his job to become a clerk at Wal-Mart so that he could pay a lower tax rate? Neither did I.<br />
<br />
There's no known case of someone giving up the chance to make lots of money just because he or she would be expected to give some back to the public in the form of taxes. Even in the 1950s when the USA had top rates exceeding ninety percent, it didn't slow down the pursuit of profit. What's far more likely to stifle entrepreneurship is the lack of a broad enough customer base. No matter how regressive taxes are, few people are going to make a product that the general public can't afford to buy.<br />
<br />
In the USA we currently have the richest, and least taxed, rich people that we've ever had, yet there's relatively poor investment because there isn't enough demand to make it worthwhile.<br />
<br />
<b>Myth</b>: <i>Higher taxes on upper incomes will cause the persons in question to leave the state</i>.<br />
And go where? The other states surrounding Illinois already have graduated taxes.<i></i>]]></description>
 <category>Issues</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=103</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:10:42 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Shooting off our mouths</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=101</link>
<description><![CDATA[When a bunch of people get killed in a gun massacre, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/12/14/1337271/white-house-responds-to-elementary-school-shooting-today-is-not-the-day-to-discuss-gun-laws/" target="_blank">it's the wrong time to discuss gun laws</a>. Have you no respect for the victims of such senseless tragedy?<br />
<br />
When people have <i>not</i> been killed, it's the wrong time to discuss gun laws, because after all if no one's being killed then the laws we have must be at least all right.<br />
<br />
When is the right time to talk about gun violence as a serious problem? That would be 12:12:12 on 2012/12/12. Sorry, you missed it.]]></description>
 <category>Issues</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=101</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:35:35 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Affordable Care Act votes to repeal Republican Congress</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=99</link>
<description><![CDATA[By Percy Flage<br />
Washington Pest staff<br />
<br />
<b>Washington, DC</b> &mdash; The Affordable Care Act, passed into law in 2010, today came out in support of repealing the current Republican Congress. The Act, informally known as Obamacare, cited excessive partisanship, rampant hypocrisy, and general subservience to the wealthy few as reasons why the Republican Congress shouldn't stand. "They spent the last decade giving the executive branch the power to spy on people or imprison them without any accountability, and then they call me big government," the Act said. "They posture about deficits and then pass tax cuts and start wars without paying for any of it. Clearly we need to repeal and replace them," it said, adding that it would figure out the last part later.<br />
<br />
Other legislation offered mixed views on whether repeal was a good idea. "I'm all in favor of diversity, but these guys are a major threat to the political and economic ecosystem," said the Endangered Species Act. "If protecting their species costs jobs then maybe it's better to let them go extinct." But the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 was less than enthusiastic. "It's true that these guys' main selling point, that they're fiscally responsible, is completely ridiculous," said the EGTRRA. "My very existence is proof of that. And yeah, some of them are just nuts. A lot of them, actually. But I remain convinced that we need them around. There's a very good reason. Give me a little while and I'm sure I'll think of it."<br />
<br />
"Percy, Percy, Percy, who's been putting these ideas into your head?" commented the USA PATRIOT Act. "It's that little blonde who you've been talking to on the train on the way to work, isn't it. You might not be so eager to talk to her if you knew about some of the things she reads in her spare time."<br />
<br />
In order to take effect, repeal would need to be passed by the voting public. In the event it does, the 2002 Help America Vote Act has pledged to veto it.]]></description>
 <category>Issues</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=99</comments>
 <pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:53:55 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Day Late, Many Thousands of Dollars Short</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=97</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120515/news/705159701/" target="_blank">Daily Herald:</a><br />
<blockquote>DuPage Forest Preserve commissioners voted unanimously Tuesday to reduce their own salaries from nearly $57,000 to $53,500, but they disagreed on whether the cuts were deep enough.<br />
<br />
Commissioner Joe Cantore suggested reducing salaries in October and on Tuesday fought to keep the issue from being tabled to next week’s commission meeting.<br />
<br />
He urged fellow commissioners to cut their salaries to $50,000, roughly equal to the annual compensation DuPage County Board members receive.<br />
<br />
“It was just time for some action,” Cantore said. “We needed to get it done. But I don’t think we reduced it enough and I guess you could call it a compromise.”</blockquote><br />
<br />
Oh Joe, you great crusading action hero you.<br />
<br />
Reality check, please. The median income per household in the USA as of the last census was a little over fifty thousand. In DuPage it's just over $75,000. Assuming an average of 1.5 wage-earners per household, that means that even if this proposal had passed, Joe and his buddies would still each have been getting the same money the rest of us get, plus very generous benefits like health care and pensions. But the rest of us have to work full time for our money; not so Joe. DuPage Forest Preserve Commissioners claim (in the Herald article linked above) to work 1000 hours a year; that's only half a full-time job, if true; the real amount of time they spend is probably quite a bit less. Most if not all of them have day jobs&mdash;Cantore is an industrial building remodeling contractor.<br />
<br />
Then there's this:<br />
<blockquote>[Outgoing commissioner Carl] Schultz said one forest commissioner represents the same number of people as three county board members per district. He added that county board members also have offices, while forest commissioners keep offices in their homes.</blockquote><br />
<br />
This is a bloody silly argument for a number of reasons. Besides the obvious, that running the forest preserves might not be quite as much work as running the entire rest of the county, the fact of the matter is that DuPage County Board members are also grossly overpaid, getting full-time salary and benefits for work they do as a sideline to their regular jobs.<br />
<br />
Joe and others, if you're really out to save the taxpayers some money, cut your salary and benefits to what a typical ten-hour-per-week position would offer. Give up your guaranteed government-provided health care and retirement income until such time as the rest of us are entitled to such things, which might happen if we get the Republicans out of state and federal government.<br />
<br />
Alternately, keep the salary and benefits, but make the Commission work for them. Make it illegal for Forest Preserve Commissioners (and County Board members) to accept any outside paid position or own a significant interest in any business during their terms. Transfer to them some of the work currently being done by salaried managers and make them spend enough time on it to earn that money we're giving them.]]></description>
 <category>Local politics</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=97</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:28:14 -0500</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Roskam tells another Roskam</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=95</link>
<description><![CDATA[If <a href="http://spreadingsantorum.com/" target="_blank">Santorum</a> is defined to refer to that certain mixture of bodily fluids, then Roskam really ought to refer to a falsehood so blatant that nobody with the remotest shred of decency would want to touch it. Sadly this class of human being includes few if any modern-day Republican politicians, and certainly not Mr. Roskam himself. Case in point, his latest <strike>tax-payer-funded campaign email</strike>constituent franking email:<br />
<blockquote>You and your families are surely affected by high and rising gas prices. The average price is already over $3.50 a gallon! Unfortunately, some experts say they could rise as high a $5-per-gallon. <br />
<br />
This is a disappointing but unfortunately not surprising reality. High gas prices and rising electricity costs are just some of the results of the Administration's energy policy designed to benefit political allies at the expense of lower American energy costs. <br />
<br />
But House Republicans are fighting back. Find out how in my interview with Martha MacCallum here. </blockquote><br />
High gas prices are the result of Obama administration policy in the world according to Pete. <a href="http://www.randomuseless.info/gasprice/gasprice.html" target="_blank">Here</a>'s a graph of those prices over the past thirty-plus years:<br />
<img src="http://www.randomuseless.info/gasprice/gasprice.png"/><br />
As you can see, gas prices were more or less stable until they took a major spike upwards around 2005 and another one in 2008. Gosh. Petey, who was President in 2005?<br />
<br />
If you watch the video, you'll find the "solution" Petey is pushing is to build the <a href="http://www.tarsandsaction.org/spread-the-word/key-facts-keystone-xl/" target="_blank">Keystone XL pipeline</a>. This pipeline is actually designed to allow Canadian oil producers to <b>export</b> oil overseas by providing a route to oil tankers in the Gulf of Mexico. Not only would this pipeline be disastrous for the health and well-being of those of us who drink water, but It might actually <b>increase</b> gas prices in the USA, and according to Cornell researchers might actually <b>cost</b> jobs in the USA.<br />
<br />
But on the plus side, it would mean fat profits for Canadian oil companies, some of which would no doubt fall into Mr. Roskam's campaign coffers. Also, more work for doctors and other health professionals who will have to treat the resulting chronic health problems. This is good news for people like Pete and his staff whose health care is paid for by public money, a benefit he's worked hard to deny to the rest of us.]]></description>
 <category>Local politics</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=95</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:07:33 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>PAC Smear?</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=93</link>
<description><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120213/news/702139761/" target="_blank">Daily Herald</a> reports:<br />
<blockquote>Tammy Duckworth, one of two Democratic Congressional candidates making a bid in the 8th District, challenged her opponent Monday to reject any contribution from Super PACs — political action committees that can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money.<br />
<br />
Opponent Raja Krishnamoorthi said he’ll agree — but only if Duckworth also agrees not to accept contributions from international unions, lobbyists or other corporations.... He also proposed that the candidates get rid of “paid media (ads)” by holding one debate a week until the election.</blockquote><br />
<br />
For Krishnamoorthi's specific proposal, look <a href="https://docs.google.com/a/rajaforcongress.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dHFaTDAxYW5NMTktTzhJTjM3YW1GWkE6MQ" target="_blank">here</a>.<br />
<br />
This morning, the Duckworth campaign sent out this:<br />
<blockquote>Yesterday, I asked my opponents to join me in a pledge to keep Super PAC spending out of this race. An overwhelming number of you signed on to agree that unlimited, anonymous funding should have no role in our democracy. But unfortunately, my primary opponent refused to sign on to the same kind of pledge Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown agreed to.<br />
<br />
As I said yesterday, this will only work if my opponent agrees. Over 7,000 of you have contributed to my campaign--often in spite of tough financial circumstances--and I'm not willing to let your contributions be overwhelmed by millions of dollars in negative attack ads.<br />
<br />
We've already seen the corrosive effect of Super PAC support in the Republican presidential primary. And frankly, I'm not surprised to see Republicans embrace unlimited, anonymous corporate funds. But using a Super PAC in a Democratic primary would be unprecedented. It's just not who we are as a party and it's not what we should aspire to be.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Hey, Duckworth campaign: Your primary opponent has a name, you know. And unless I'm missing something, the above is just dishonest.<br />
<br />
How is it dishonest?  For one thing, it's true that using a Super PAC in a Democratic primary would be unprecedented. That's why it's <em>probably not going to happen.</em> Joe Walsh will almost surely benefit from SuperPACs in the general election against whichever Democrat wins in March (and the chance of him signing onto any agreement of this sort are basically nil). But talking about a SuperPAC attack in the primary as if it were a clear and present danger is disingenuous at best, and is an indication of a campaign that is less interested in taking the influence of money out of the election and more interested in using it as a publicity stunt.<br />
<br />
But more importantly, Krishnamoorthi didn't fold, he raised the bet. He didn't refuse to sign on, he asked for a broader agreement that would have taken other kinds of money out as well, plus public debates that would've lessened the impact of paid media. Maybe the Duckworth campaign views these extra conditions as unacceptable. It would be reasonable to say that Krishnamoorthi didn't refuse an agreement but attached conditions to it that they viewed as unacceptable. Then maybe they could tell us why they feel that one kind of outside money is bad but other kinds (which are far more likely to actually show up in this particular race) are absolutely necessary. But just portraying Krishnamoorthi's response as a flat-out "no" is flat-out dishonest.<br />
]]></description>
 <category>Local politics</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=93</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:39:48 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Dear Republicans</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=91</link>
<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/mittbaker.jpg"/><br />
"I am the nominee, whether you like it or not."]]></description>
 <category>Stuff</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=91</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:10:25 -0600</pubDate>
</item><item>
 <title>Endorsed: Greg Brownfield for State Senate District 23</title>
 <link>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=90</link>
<description><![CDATA[<img style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 15px 15px" src="http://yorkdemocrats.org/images/brownfield.jpg"/><br />
This race is already shaping up as one of the more active state ones in the area, with three Democratic candidates and two on the other side. For what it's worth, I endorse <a href="http://gregbrownfield.org/" target="_blank">Greg Brownfield</a> over <a href="http://www.allenforillinois.com/" target="_blank">Kevin Allen</a> and <a href="http://www.tomcullertonforsenate.com/" target="_blank">Thomas Cullerton</a>.<br />
<br />
Having worked as a legal aid attorney giving free advice to people who can't afford a lawyer, Greg Brownfield knows first-hand how the wrecked economy is affecting people. He talks about a compassion deficit, the obligation of government to the needy which is as important as its other debts; we must not balance the state's books on the backs of the most vulnerable. Brownfield is also highly skilled at bringing together large crowds of motivated volunteers, a skill that our nominee will surely need in order to take on someone with the resources of a Pankau or Ramey.<br />
<br />
Each of the candidates in this primary has something valuable to offer. Kevin Allen is a friend, a smart guy who's been active for years in local politics against the Republican machine. Tom Cullerton is the best village president that Villa Park has seen for quite some time. Either of them would make a fine State Senator, and I'd be happy to support either of them after the primary. But until then, Brownfield is endorsed.]]></description>
 <category>Local politics</category>
<comments>http://www.garykleppe.org/index.php?itemid=90</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:01:58 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>